Completed university course
Environmental Ethics
A twelve-lecture path through foundations, classic texts and applications. It moves from the vocabulary of moral consideration to conflicts concerning climate, biodiversity and public decisions.
Università degli Studi di Urbino Carlo Bo · 2025/2026 · 6 credits · 36 hours
Taught in the 2025/2026 academic year, the course combined participatory lectures, close reading and case discussion. Its aim was to make the moral assumptions of different positions explicit and develop independent arguments.
The programme addressed anthropocentrism, biocentrism and ecocentrism; individuals and ecological wholes; pluralism and relational perspectives. The core text was Matteo Andreozzi’s Le sfide dell’etica ambientale. Filosofia analitica e cervi accompanies the lecturer’s approach.
Programme
Foundations
What environmental ethics asks
The field, its methods and the philosophical stakes of ecological crisis.
Nature, environment, ecology
The vocabulary used to describe living systems and the value judgements it can carry.
Facts, values, uncertainty
The relations between scientific evidence, moral reasoning and decision-making.
Who counts?
Objects and theories of moral consideration: humans, animals, organisms and systems.
Genealogies of nature
Continuity, dualisms and historical changes in relations with the environment.
Pluralism and public reasons
How to reason when values and perspectives conflict.
Classics and the canon
Leopold and the biotic community
The land ethic and changing ways of perceiving the ecological community.
Callicott and holism
The systematisation of the land ethic and the tension between communities and individuals.
Rolston and Næss
Value in nature, species and processes; deep ecology and the ecological self.
Boundaries and connections
Conservation and animal ethics in dialogue with relational and critical approaches.
Applications
Climate, energy, public decision-making
Responsibility, precaution and justice in ecological transition.
Places and conflicts
Biodiversity, wildlife management and deliberation among different interests and values.